twitter RSS Feed
Mar 3

Greece & Italy Day 4a: Berea

Posted on Thursday, March 3, 2011 in Pontifications

The following is the devotional site presentation I gave to our group at Berea today.

“As soon as it was night, the believers sent Paul and Silas away to Berea. On arriving there, they went to the Jewish synagogue. Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true. As a result, many of them believed, as did also a number of prominent Greek women and many Greek men.”

“But when the Jews in Thessalonica learned that Paul was preaching the word of God at Berea, some of them went there too, agitating the crowds and stirring them up. The believers immediately sent Paul to the coast, but Silas and Timothy stayed at Berea. Those who escorted Paul brought him to Athens and then left with instructions for Silas and Timothy to join him as soon as possible.”

Apart from a later passage mentioning that one of Paul’s travelling companions was Sopater son of Pyrrhus from Berea (Acts 20:4), this passage from Acts 17:10-15 is the sole mention of Berea in Scripture.

After facing opposition in Thessalonica, where their host and other believers were dragged before the city council, Paul and Silas departed for Berea where they once again began preaching in the Jewish synagogue. In Acts, Luke praises the receptivity of the Bereans, declaring them to be “of more noble character” – the New Living Translation says they were “more open-minded” – since they received Paul’s message with eagerness and examined the Scriptures daily to see if what he said was true. Many of them believed – as is also attested by the fact that Paul later has a travelling companion from Berea – but then Thessalonian Jews followed them there to agitate against them. Acts doesn’t go into detail here, so we don’t know the extent of the trouble caused, but it was enough that Paul immediately departed for Athens, from which he later went to Corinth. It wasn’t so severe, however, that Silas and Timothy felt compelled to leave, so they stayed behind for awhile and then later rejoined Paul once he’d gone to Corinth.

Comparatively, this is a relatively minor Scriptural mention. There are no New Testament letters written specifically to the believers at Berea, as there are for those at Thessalonica, Philippi, Corinth, Rome, and elsewhere. In fact, when describing his travels within his own letters, Paul never singles out Berea for mention, even though it seems likely that he passed through there on other occasions as well.

And yet despite this, the Bereans served then and serve now as a model for the proper response to the Gospel message, summarized in a single verse: “Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true” (Acts 17:11).

Luke declares the Berean Jews to be “of more noble character” than those in Thessalonica, which admittedly may not have been a very high bar given what they had just experienced there. But what’s notable is what they are praised for – they received the message with eagerness and they examined the Scriptures daily to verify Paul’s truthfulness.

Now one danger many Christians have in reading this passage is that we see the word “Scriptures” and think “Bible.” It’s important to remember, however, that any such references in the New Testament are not referring to the New Testament itself, which was not in existence at the time.

In studying this, that fact reminded me of the importance of studying the Old Testament and not developing a faith that’s based simply on the New Testament. On a trip like this, where so much of our attention is focused on the players in the New Testament and where they went and what they did, the Bereans serve to remind us that the “Apostle to the Gentiles” often went first to the Jewish synagogue, where he preached the Gospel to people grounded in the Scriptures and acquired his first converts.

The Bereans also demonstrate that those who responded properly did so not by blindly accepting Paul’s message, but by comparing it to the Scriptures and making sure it was in alignment. While from our standpoint we may be tempted to ask “if you can’t trust Paul, who can you trust?”, it’s important to remember that Paul was the new guy in town, preaching a revolutionary new message. Regardless, this still functions to remind us that we can’t solely depend on the word of any human authority, but need to investigate to ensure that what they are declaring agrees with the Scriptures, which for us today means both the Old and New Testaments. This means that those, like myself, who often find ourselves gravitating toward easily digestible devotionals rather than digging into the Scriptures ourselves, need to be careful that we’re not accepting someone else’s teaching in contradiction to the testimony of Scripture.

It’s also important to note that the Berean Jews didn’t just boot up their BibleWorks software, decide Paul’s message matched Scripture, and call it good. Acts says that they examined the Scriptures not just once, but every day. As someone who – how shall I put it? – tends more toward an experiential than an intellectual faith, I find this especially convicting. Scripture is never something we are done examining. For those of us in seminary, that’s also a reminder that upon graduation we are not done growing in our knowledge of the Bible. The Bereans challenge us to return again and again to the Scriptures to ensure that the teaching we are receiving reflects Biblical truth.

All told, despite the brevity of their Biblical appearance, the Bereans teach us valuable lessons in their proper response to the Gospel message – we must value the Old Testament, test all teachings against Scripture, and study Scripture regularly. Then we, too, can be “of more noble character than those in Thessalonica.”

Mar 2

Greece & Italy Day 3: In which Luke kicks archaeologists’ collective butts

Posted on Wednesday, March 2, 2011 in Pontifications

We began the day with a visit to the crypt beneath St. Demetrius Church, which was built on top of (noticing a theme?) Roman baths from an earlier era. This was followed by a visit to the remains of the Roman forum, which we’d passed numerous times since it’s right next to our hotel in the center of town (which is one of the strangest things about it). This too wasn’t an exception to the everything-is-built-on-everything-else rule – they’ve unearthed a Hellenistic bath house, which I believe they said was the oldest discovery in Thessaloniki, or some such (I really need to get a small notebook like Heather so I can take notes). Fourth or 2nd century B.C., I think. But don’t quote me on that.

Hellenistic Sauna

Hellenistic Bath House

This (the forum underneath this forum) was likely the place Paul’s host Jason was dragged when they caused such turmoil in Acts 17. This is a great distance from Jason’s “traditional” house, which our guide pointed out makes it even less likely that is really Jason’s house.

We next headed to the Museum of Byzantine Culture, which only had 3 of its 11 rooms open due to Greece’s budget issues (they apparently can’t afford to keep it fully staffed). Thus, we got to learn about the early Christian or early Byzantine period (4th-7th century), but missed out on the middle, late, and post-Byzantine periods (8th-19th century). One interesting exhibit on cemeteries and funeral customs during the early Christian period stated that crosses didn’t begin appearing on tombs until after the official adoption of Christianity as the state religion in the 4th century. I’ve also become fascinated by the fact that early Christians used the peacock as a symbol of eternity and heaven. Kind of cool, but seemingly random.

We next headed over to the Archaeological Museum of Thessaloniki, where we cajoled our way into getting taken through the apparently closed main exhibit. This included a lot of cool stuff, including a marker from the Via Egnatia which declared who’d built it (Gnaeus Egnatius, the proconsul of Macedonia, go figure). It’s been interesting to learn about the other gods worshiped here (including Egyptian gods like Isis and Osiris), but the most fascinating aspect on that front was a mention that Demeter was worshiped in her roles as both a mother and a virgin. Huh.

Egnatia Marker

Marker from Via Egnatia

The most exciting artifact, though, was an inscription that used a longer form of the word “politarch.” This was a word Luke used to describe civic officials in Thessaloniki and for a long time people used that to discredit Luke, since no one thought that term had been in use that early. However, now numerous inscriptions have been unearthed revealing that Luke was in fact accurate and that term was being used here at that time. Most such inscriptions are now in the British Museum and our guide was happy to find that there is one still here.

After getting a break to go grab lunch (gyros, yum!), we headed to the Arch of Galerius, an interesting triumphal arch that once spanned the Via Egnatia, then to the Rotunda of St. George, which had served as a mausoleum for Galerius (most likely), then as a church, then as a mosque, and now as a museum. At this point I was struck by our guide’s off-repeated mentions of the “Turkish occupation” that lasted 500 years – interesting that such a long time was still considered an “occupation” especially when we consider our own country’s history of being around for less than half that amount of time.

After that we got a bit of free time, so we headed over to Starbucks (partly to check out their Greece- and Thessaloniki-specific mugs), then down to what we think is the Aegean Sea (or possibly a bay off of it, you know how those things work) to visit a statue of Alexander the Great. We then headed back to the Roman forum to shoot some videos for Heather’s missions team that will be headed here and for her blog in general.

Gyros

Gyros!

Dinner was next (lots of good meats – I’m glad this is what my professor referred to as a “meat culture”), where we met Mike and Maria Long, who pastor a church here. Mike is American, while Maria is Greek and hysterically funny, which we’re realizing seems to be true of most Greek folks we know. We then headed to their church service, where Dr. Wilson (my professor who’s leading this trip) shared about what’s going on at the church he pastors in Turkey (in the city known Biblically as Smyrna – see Revelation 2), as well as in Iran, Iraq, and other countries in this region. We prayed for the many refugees in Turkey, as well as for improved relations between Turkey and Greece, which have historically been enemies, so that the Gospel can advance in Turkey. According to Dr. Wilson, Turkey is the least evangelized country in the world, with Christians (including Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant) making up less than .1% of the population.

Tomorrow morning we depart Thessaloniki to head through Veria (the Berea of Acts 17, about which I have to give a presentation) and Vergina to spend the night in Preveza. Not sure of the significance of those last two, so we’ll see what tomorrow holds.

Mar 1

Greece & Italy Day 2: Layered History

Posted on Tuesday, March 1, 2011 in Pontifications

Lion of Amphipolis

Lion of Amphipolis

Layered. That’s the word I’d use to describe history here. It’s layers upon layers – and I mean that quite literally – Byzantine architecture on top of Roman architecture on top of Greek architecture. Today we drove down a major highway – that in large part corresponded with the ancient Roman road Via Egnatia – to visit Neapolis, where Paul first landed when he sailed from Troas; Phillipi, where Paul met Lydia, his first convert in Macedonia (northern Greece); and Amphipolis, which Paul next travelled to (and which has an amazingly large stone lion from 400 BC!) en route to Thessaloniki (which we returned to at the end of the day).

The layered history was very evident in Amphipolis, with its three concentric circling walls – if I remember right, the outermost was Hellenistic, next was the Roman, and then the Byzantine. Amphipolis had a small museum where our guide told us about pre-historic and archaic Greece with the Cycladic civilization on islands in the Aegean Sea, the Minoan civilization in Crete, and the Mycenaean civilization in the Peloponnese, all pre-dating the ancient Greek culture with which we are more familiar.

In Phillipi we visited the remains of an ancient Roman forum (agora, in Greek) where our guide pointed out the bema, or podium. Interestingly, this was also called the “judgment seat” and was doubtless what Paul was referring to when he talked about us appearing before the “judgment seat” of Christ (Paul was dragged before a number of these himself, possibly including this one).

We also saw the remains of several Christian basilicas. It was fascinating to be able to trace the format of the narthex, nave, and apse, which we’d seen the day before at St. Demetrius Church, and realize that these had been active churches so very long ago. One seemingly impressive basilica had never actually been used – its dome collapsed in the course of its construction. Our guide used it to make the point that large buildings aren’t necessary when you compare that unused structure to what Paul was able to accomplish at the riverside.

Basilica B

Unused Basilica

The riverside was our next stop, where Paul met, converted, and baptized Lydia. Although they can’t be sure of the exact spot, they know which river and approximately where it must have been. Very fascinating.

Phillipi River

River in Phillipi where Paul met Lydia

Mar 1

Greece & Italy Study Tour: Day 1: It’s Tradition

Posted on Tuesday, March 1, 2011 in Pontifications

I’m a day late posting — this refers to yesterday.

After our overnight flight from DC, we arrived in Thessaloniki at 1:30pm their time (6:30am our time).  We were the last contingent to arrive, so we all clambered into the bus to head to the hotel.  Our education began immediately as our guide from Aristotle Travel began pointing out the sites to us en route to the hotel.  We learned a great deal about the history of Thessaloniki and the major role it played in various empires.  Our hotel is at the edge of the Aristotelous Plaza, which runs all the way down to the sea.  Hopefully some night we’ll have time to walk down there.

Thessaloniki

View of Thessaloniki from the tower on the wall

We did a driving tour of the city and got to visit a portion of its ancient wall, which repelled numerous attacks throughout history.  We visited a tower on the wall overlooking the city – an incredible view.  We also visited St. Demetrius Church, named after a saint in the Greek Orthodox Church.  It was fascinating to learn about the structure of the churches – the narthex, nave, and the “holy of holies” (in the apse) where only the priests could go.

St. Demetrius Church

Inside St. Demetrius Church

Another interesting site included the outside (we couldn’t get in) of the supposed house of Jason, Paul’s host in the city who was dragged before the city council.  In explaining that there isn’t an exceptionally large chance that this actually is in fact Jason’s house, our guide made one of my favorite statements thus far:  “It’s tradition.”

We ended the day by meeting up with Philip and Nina from the A21 campaign, who Heather will be working with when she leads a missions trip here in a couple months.  It was fun hanging out with them and learning their stories  – he’s from Denmark, she’s from Norway, they met in Australia, and they’re getting married in August.  They are doing incredible work in this country and our missions team is going to have an awesome time working with them — I wish I was going to be on that trip!

Feb 27

Greece & Italy Study Tour: Day 0

Posted on Sunday, February 27, 2011 in Pontifications

Heather and I embark on a study tour of Greece and Italy today, departing this afternoon but not arriving in Thessaloniki, Greece until tomorrow, so I’m not quite sure today should be considered Day 1.  Poor Heather had an overnight flight from California last night (where she visited Disneyland, so I can’t feel too sorry for her) and then has this one tonight.

We’re really excited about this trip!  This is my second-to-last semester of seminary (just one church history class left to take this summer) and this study tour counts toward my degree, so I’m also getting credit for it (how can you beat that?).  I have to keep a daily journal during the trip (to be edited and turned in afterwards) so depending on the internet situation, some of that content may end up on here.  We’ll see.

The itinerary can be found here.  Not sure which part I’m most excited about, but I can tell you what isn’t my favorite part — in Berea I have to give a devotional site presentation to our group.  A little nervous about that.  But at least that’s only a few days into the trip and then it’s all down hill from there.

Jan 25

Coaching at NCC

Posted on Tuesday, January 25, 2011 in Pontifications

At National Community Church last year, we implemented a new support structure for our small group leaders consisting of three teams:

  • The Training Team, whose members develop video training modules and lead leaders-only small groups as well as many of our core discipleship groups.
  • The Coordinating Team, whose members are each focused on a different NCC service and responsible for promoting group life there — recruiting congregants into small groups and helping small group members step up into small group leadership.
  • And the Coaching Team, for which I’m the coordinator.

The coaches are tasked with providing support and care for our small group leaders. They are trained in listening well, asking good questions, and helping leaders set goals and create action steps. Although mentoring will undoubtedly be a part of most coaching relationships, mentoring is different from coaching.  Dale Stoll perhaps said it best: “Mentoring is imparting to you what God has given me; coaching is drawing out of you what God has put in you.”

In their first semester of leadership, small group leaders are required to meet with a coach three times — once to get to know each other, once to discuss the “Leading Yourself Well” training module, and once to discuss the “Building Biblical Community” training module.

After the first semester, coaching becomes optional, but our hope is that all small group leaders who can benefit from such a relationship will choose to continue it, meeting at whichever frequency they and their coach agree would be beneficial.  For those who desire a mentoring or peer accountability relationship, our coaches have been trained in helping leaders to find and develop such relationships.

For those leaders who choose not to continue with coaching after their first semester, we switch them to “basic care” status, which simply means they are contacted by their coach once a semester just to remind them that they are available if they need anything.

This is a relatively new system and we are still working out the kinks and hitting our stride.  But we hope that through this system our leaders will receive the support, care, and encouragement that they need as they grow in their faith and seek to help others do the same.

Jan 24

Worshipping Idols on the Sabbath

Posted on Monday, January 24, 2011 in Pontifications

Do you want to know one of the easiest ways to figure out what the idols in your life are?  Just take a look at what prevents you from observing the Sabbath.

Last night (and again today) my amazing wife preached an incredible sermon (per usual) on the Ten Commandments, in which she hit on both idolatry and the Sabbath.  Interestingly, Scripture explains the Sabbath as both a time of rest (as God rested on the seventh day during Creation) and as a remembrance of being freed from slavery, making it a reminder that we should not be enslaved to anything (for more, I highly recommend The Rest of God).

It was well-timed for me, given that I’m trying to observe Sabbath on Sundays but had already concluded that I was going to need to spend my Sabbath not resting, but instead frantically reading one of my seminary books — by midnight Sunday I needed to submit an “affidavit” certifying that I’d finished the assigned reading (what kind of professor does that to you?).

That was my plan — until God pointed out that my professor’s opinion of me had become an idol that I was willing to violate the Sabbath for. I’ve always struggled with being a people-pleaser and here was a case in point – I was enslaved to the opinion of my professor and had turned his approval (and to a lesser extent, my grades) into an idol.

What prevents you from observing the Sabbath?  Does it represent an idol in your life?

Jan 16

My (and Your) Must-Read Books of 2011

Posted on Sunday, January 16, 2011 in Pontifications

A friend recently asked me for my must-read book list of 2010.  After snarkily responding with the required reading for my seminary classes this semester, I gave the subject a bit more thought, especially since I’ll be finishing seminary before the year’s out, so I’ll actually have time for some reading of my own choosing.  That, plus I’m always happy to recommend what should be on other people’s must-read list.

My own must-read list consists of four books at this point:

- How People Grow by Henry Cloud and John Townsend — Reading this book diverted me from pursuing a counseling degree to pursuing a seminary degree, so it will be interesting to re-read it once I’ve finished seminary.  Plus, when I first read it I felt like it was a book I should re-read each year, so I’m definitely overdue to revisit it.

- Soulprint by Mark Batterson — This is my pastor’s latest book (being released this week), so I’m definitely looking forward to reading it.  It’s about discovering your God-given identity, which is something I’m always keen on.

- The Making of a Leader by J. Robert Clinton — I’ve heard a talk based on this book, plus read an article by the author that was basically a shorter version of the book.  Looking forward to diving into the whole thing.  He’s got great stuff on the different stages a leader passes through over the course of their life.

- Coaching Life-Changing Small Group Leaders by Bill Donahue and Greg Bowman — I’ve been training our church’s coaches using general coach training and am a bit overdue for reading something on coaching specifically in a church context.

I’d recommend all of the above for your own must-read list this year, although your interest in the last one may be dependent on your role.  In addition to the above, the following are books, plays, or literary excerpts that everyone (especially artists for some of them) should read, so there’s no time like the present to add them to your reading list for the year:

- The Cocktail Party by T.S. Eliot — A fantastic play I hope to produce some day.  Two main story lines involve one person’s “through the glass darkly” moment of recognizing there’s much more to this world than meets the eye, and a couple’s struggle to embrace the vulnerability of a marriage relationship.

- My Name is Asher Lev by Chaim  Potok — My favorite novel, this is about a Hasidic Jewish boy who is a gifted artist in a community that does not value such gifts.

- Walking on Water by Madeleine L’Engle — A must-read for all Christian artists, this Christian mystic is perhaps most widely known as the author of A Wrinkle in Time.  Here she ruminates on faith and art.

- “Letter to My Children,” the introduction to the book Witness by Whittaker Chambers — One of the most powerful pieces of writing I’ve read, it explains the inherent conflict between Faith and Communism.

- The Grand Inquisitor chapter (available online here) in The Brothers Karamazov by Dostoyevsky – Powerful story about how Jesus can be misappropriated by the Church.

- Creators by Paul Johnson — Fascinating profiles of a lot of creative types.

- The Divine Conspiracy by Dallas Willard – The kingdom of God is here.  Now.

Have fun reading!

Jan 13

Patronage, Reciprocity & Other Big Words: A post about gratitude

Posted on Thursday, January 13, 2011 in Pontifications

“The proper response toward a patron is gratitude: offering honor, loyalty, testimony and service to the patron.”

Patron?  What is this, another arts-related post?  Or is it about customer service?

None of the above.  I’m currently reading “An Introduction to the New Testament: Contexts, Methods, & Ministry Formation” by David A. deSilva, not (unfortunately) because I read that sort of thing for fun like my wife is wont to do, but because it’s required reading for one of my current seminary classes.

I was struck by its explanation of the patronal system in the Greco-Roman world of the early church, in which networks of favor and loyalty were developed.  In short, patrons did favors for clients, who in turn showed loyalty and gratitude to the patron.  Some patrons were “brokers” whose main favor was to connect their client to someone else (often their own patron).  The Christian correlation is God as patron, Jesus as patron/broker, and us as the client.

Which brings us to the appropriate response of the client (us) to our patrons (God and Jesus), mentioned in that quote above (honor, loyalty, testimony and service to the patron and all that jazz).

So here’s the kicker:  “While God’s favor remains free and uncoerced, the first-century hearer knows that to accept a gift also meant accepting the obligation to respond properly.” That emphasis — you know, with the italics and all — would be mine.

My point?  Well, actually, my question?  Does the twenty-first century hearer know that to accept a gift means to accept the obligation to respond properly?

Yes, we’d all assent to the idea that a gift merits gratitude, but given that the whole patronal system thing is less woven into the fabric of our society than it was back in the early church day, do we have a harder time responding to God with the proper gratitude and loyalty?

Jan 4

Ruminate. Ponder. Consider. Introspect. Reflect. Think.

Posted on Tuesday, January 4, 2011 in Pontifications

I’ve been woefully neglectful of my coaching clients lately.  And in the process of hurried coaching I’ve come to realize I’ve been woefully neglecting something else.

One of my neglected coachees is Maegan Stout, who is seeking to write – on her blog and elsewhere – more frequently.  Several weeks ago I was squeezing time out of my busy schedule to quickly read one of her blog posts, hoping enough of it would lodge in my brain that I’d be able to intelligently comment on it to her later.  That’s when it hit me.  Not only did I lack time to reflect on what she had written, but her post was the product of her own ability to take time to reflect.

Between working full-time, attending seminary part-time, recruiting and training NCC’s coaches, and doing some coaching (however inadequately) myself, I’m beyond busy.  One thing that has gotten squeezed out of my schedule – because it doesn’t generally operate according to a schedule – is time to ruminate and consider.  This isn’t just about pondering deep thoughts but also simply processing life events, reflecting on them and gleaning the wisdom that’s to be had.

This has impacted my schoolwork — many of my papers could greatly benefit from some deep consideration, but far too often I only give the topics the superficial consideration necessary to generate a paper of the requisite pages.  This has affected my coach training — lacking time to develop a coherent philosophy I often feed our coaches a scattershot of advice and best practices, not taking time to think about how it all integrates together and at times only stumbling into important realizations and operational shifts.

And above all this affects my spiritual growth, hindering my ability to learn and develop and become more of the man that God created me to be.

I wish I was writing this to say that I’ve discovered the perfect solution.  But I haven’t.  I know various pieces — the Sabbath I need to be more intentional about implementing, the journaling that needs to be a part of the quiet time that I all too often sleep through, the Bible-reading which should probably occur somewhere other than on the bus on the way to work, etc.  But the ability to actually make those happen is the difficult part.

Even now, I’m only able to think and write about this because I’m out of the office, out of the city, and between semesters for 10 wonderful days [I composed this post a week ago but only posted now].  But on January 3rd it’s back to the office and back to school.  I’m looking forward to shifting to only one class in the summer to finally being done by fall, but for the time being I’ll still be taking my usual two classes.

Which means little time to ruminate.  This blog may very well serve as the best barometer of whether I’m taking time to ponder and reflect.  If I’m not posting, the answer is probably no.  We’ll see…